This Excel tool helps Part C coordinators plan and track their yearly tasks to meet IDEA fiscal requirements on time. It provides a customizable overview of state-level IDEA fiscal activities and links to resources.
Frequently Asked Questions on Changes to the Uniform Grant Guidance
This FAQ document from the U.S. Department of Education addresses common questions about April 2024 revisions to Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Specifically, it focuses on 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, and describes changes that apply to Department of Education grants, including IDEA Part C and Part B grants. The FAQ explains when the revisions go into effect and changes to the de minimis indirect rate, prior approval requirements, and audit requirements.
Calculating IDEA Part C Maintenance of Effort
This practice guide explains when to make budget and expenditure comparisons, provides sample calculations, and shows how and when to use allowances to adjust your state’s level of effort.
Calculating IDEA Part B Population and Poverty Payments for Local Educational Agencies
This practice guide explains how to calculate Part B population and poverty payments to local educational agencies and provides sample calculations for each. It describes the sources of data that states commonly use to measure population and poverty and reviews issues to consider.
Identifying, Correcting, and Reporting Noncompliance: A State Guide
State agencies must have a general supervision system in place to (1) improve educational results and functional outcomes for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families and children with disabilities and (2) ensure that local education agencies and early intervening services programs and providers meet the requirements under the IDEA. State general supervision systems must be reasonably designed to meet these goals. A key responsibility of state general supervision systems is identifying, correcting, and reporting noncompliance. This guide focuses on the steps involved in these processes and is based on the Office of Special Education Programs QA 23-01: State General Supervision Responsibilities Under Parts B and C of the IDEA.
Part B Significant Disproportionality Protocol
In 2024, this protocol was implemented as part of OSEP’s Differentiated Monitoring and Supports (DMS) to ensure that states properly monitor significant disproportionality within their LEAs. The protocol addresses five specific components: (1) Significant Disproportionality Definitions, (2) Annual Determinations of Significant Disproportionality, (3) Comprehensive Coordinated Early Intervening Services, (4) Maintenance of Effort, and (5) Other Related Considerations.
IDEA Part C Maintenance of Effort: The Basics
This TA On Demand video reviews the IDEA prohibition against supplanting requirement, also known as maintenance of effort. It identifies sources of state and local funds to include in MOE and describes the circumstances under which allowances may be made to reduce a state’s required level of effort.
To learn how to make these calculations, watch IDEA Part C Maintenance of Effort: Calculations.
IDEA Part C Maintenance of Effort: Calculations
This TA On Demand video reviews the two comparisons that states must make to show that they are meeting the IDEA Part C maintenance of effort requirement. The video walks through the calculations for a sample state.
For an introduction to the two comparisons and the sources of funds that may be included, watch IDEA Part C Maintenance of Effort: The Basics.
Budgeting and Monitoring IDEA Part B State Set-Aside Funds
This practice guide helps states set aside IDEA funds to administer their Part B programs and support other state-level activities. It describes the maximum set-aside amounts, allowable uses, and the importance of tracking expenditures during the life cycle of the grant.
Reallocating Local Educational Agency IDEA Part B Funds
This practice guide helps states manage unspent LEA Part B funds and reduce the need to revert them to the federal government. State fiscal staff will learn when and how funds may be reallocated to other LEAs and when the state may keep them for state-level activities.